← IoT Privacy Database

Bark

Bark Technologies, Inc. · Kids' Device / Parental Monitor

Staff Reviewed — a person at DeSpy reviewed this rating.

4.0Surveillance
Index
Policy — what its policy permitsC
Evidence — what research provesC

Bark ingests and scans a child's private communications across 30+ apps: text messages, social-media DMs, email, browser searches, and saved photos and videos, plus location, running them through AI to surface flagged alerts (bullying, sexual content, self-harm) to parents. By design it reads deeply sensitive content about children, though it surfaces alerts rather than a full transcript and says it does not sell data.

Why this rating

Collects extraordinarily sensitive children's content and location (-15) and the monitored child has no practical opt-out (-10); broad, open-ended 'including but not limited to' collection language is vague (-7); partial credit for its alert-only, minimize-what-parents-see design (+4). No confirmed breach, sale, or regulatory action against Bark; independent scrutiny is limited to journalism and reviews, so the evidence axis reflects thin documented harm rather than a clean record.

What it is

Manufacturer
Bark Technologies, Inc.
Category
Kids' Device / Parental Monitor
Model years
2016-present
Market status
Current
Companion app
Bark

The evidence 2

Independent research, regulatory action, lawsuits and journalism about how this device handles personal data — the "what actually happens" axis. Each links to its source.

  1. Journalism · HuffPost · 2018-09

    Reporting on the scale of Bark's scanning of children's private messages, and the surveillance/privacy tradeoffs of monitoring kids' communications at scale.

    Why it matters here: Documents the breadth of children's private data this exact service reads.

  2. Journalism · CBS News · 2017-03

    Coverage of Bark's monitoring model and the privacy tension of covert scanning of children's messages.

    Why it matters here: Independent coverage of Bark's monitoring model, noting both its scanning scope and its privacy-preserving design choices.

Are you the maker? Respond to this finding

Free. There is no paid or faster path, and nothing about a rating is for sale. Prove you control your company's domain with one DNS record; a person then reads your statement beside our finding and decides whether to publish it.

An email is encrypted at rest and opened only to answer you; it is erased 30 days after we resolve this (or 180 days if still open), and you can erase it sooner. Unproven filings are deleted after 14 days.

Think something here is wrong?

Evidence and research improve when people push back. Tell us what to re-check — a misattributed domain, an outdated classification, a claim about your own app — and a human will review it. Responses can take up to 30 days.

If you leave an email it is encrypted at rest and opened only to answer you — never shared, never used for anything else. It is erased 30 days after we resolve this (or 180 days if it is still open) without you asking, and you can erase it sooner at any time; either way your correction stays, anonymously. Leave it blank and your request is fully anonymous from the start (we store no IP address either way).

Descriptive, cited, not legal advice; ratings are versioned and corrections create a new version. Data from the IoT Info Grabber DB research project, CC BY-SA 4.0.

← Back to the IoT Privacy Database