← IoT Privacy Database

Eufy (Anker) Security Camera

Anker Innovations (Eufy) · Camera / Doorbell

Staff Reviewed — a person at DeSpy reviewed this rating.

7.5Surveillance
Index
Policy — what its policy permitsF
Evidence — what research provesF

Marketed as 'local-only' storage, but cameras streamed unencrypted footage to the cloud and stored a unique ID for everyone filmed, which Anker later admitted after a security researcher's disclosure.

Why this rating

Anker/Eufy marketed its cameras as local-only and encrypted, but independent researchers proved footage streamed unencrypted to the cloud and a persistent unique ID was stored for everyone filmed — a direct contradiction of the company's core privacy promise.

What it is

Manufacturer
Anker Innovations (Eufy)
Category
Camera / Doorbell
Model years
2016-present
Market status
Current
Companion app
eufy Security

The evidence 5

Independent research, regulatory action, lawsuits and journalism about how this device handles personal data — the "what actually happens" axis. Each links to its source.

  1. Journalism · AppleInsider · 2023-01-31

    Anker admitted its Eufy security cameras, marketed as storing footage locally and encrypted, had in fact streamed unencrypted footage to the cloud.

    Why it matters here: Direct admission by Anker that Eufy cameras were never actually encrypted as marketed.

  2. Journalism · Gizmodo · 2023-01-01

    Gizmodo's investigation into the Eufy unencrypted-cloud-streaming scandal that contradicted the brand's local-only privacy marketing.

    Why it matters here: Gizmodo's investigation into the Eufy unencrypted-cloud scandal.

  3. Journalism · Gizmodo · 2022-12-01

    Earlier Gizmodo report first surfacing evidence that Eufy cameras transmitted unencrypted footage to the cloud despite local-storage marketing claims.

    Why it matters here: Earlier Gizmodo report first surfacing the Eufy cloud-streaming evidence.

  4. Journalism · The Register · 2023-03-17

    Reports that Eufy cameras generated and stored a persistent unique identifier for every person captured on camera, raising facial-recognition privacy concerns.

    Why it matters here: Report on Eufy's persistent unique-ID tracking of everyone filmed.

  5. Lawsuit · ClassAction.org · 2023-02-01

    Class action filed against Anker alleging Eufy cameras secretly uploaded user images and live footage to the cloud despite local-only marketing.

    Why it matters here: Class action directly targets Eufy's secret cloud-upload practices.

Are you the maker? Respond to this finding

Free. There is no paid or faster path, and nothing about a rating is for sale. Prove you control your company's domain with one DNS record; a person then reads your statement beside our finding and decides whether to publish it.

An email is encrypted at rest and opened only to answer you; it is erased 30 days after we resolve this (or 180 days if still open), and you can erase it sooner. Unproven filings are deleted after 14 days.

Think something here is wrong?

Evidence and research improve when people push back. Tell us what to re-check — a misattributed domain, an outdated classification, a claim about your own app — and a human will review it. Responses can take up to 30 days.

If you leave an email it is encrypted at rest and opened only to answer you — never shared, never used for anything else. It is erased 30 days after we resolve this (or 180 days if it is still open) without you asking, and you can erase it sooner at any time; either way your correction stays, anonymously. Leave it blank and your request is fully anonymous from the start (we store no IP address either way).

Descriptive, cited, not legal advice; ratings are versioned and corrections create a new version. Data from the IoT Info Grabber DB research project, CC BY-SA 4.0.

← Back to the IoT Privacy Database