← IoT Privacy Database

Humane AI Pin

Humane Inc. · AI Wearable / Assistant

Staff Reviewed — a person at DeSpy reviewed this rating.

3.9Surveillance
Index
Policy — what its policy permitsD
Evidence — what research provesC

The AI Pin is a body-worn camera-and-microphone assistant that captures the wearer's surroundings - and any bystanders in them - and offloads audio, images and context to the cloud for AI processing, with location included. A 'Trust Light' is meant to signal active capture, but bystanders have no account, notice or control. The device was fully cloud-dependent, and when HP bought Humane's assets in early 2025 the Pins were remotely bricked and all data on Humane's servers was deleted, a stark demonstration of how much control the vendor held over a device strapped to your chest.

Why this rating

Policy is docked for continuous capture of audio, images, surroundings and precise location - inherently sensitive and sweeping in bystanders (sensitive-collection) - plus vague retention, arbitration, and a unilateral change so extreme the vendor remotely disabled every device (unilateral-change). Evidence rests on substantial independent coverage: launch-era reporting flagged the bystander-recording and always-on concerns, and the Feb 2025 HP acquisition/shutdown - bricking hardware and deleting all cloud data - concretely showed the abandonment and vendor-control risk; the Trust Light is a partial mitigation and much of the surveillance concern was prospective, keeping the evidence axis mid-range.

What it is

Manufacturer
Humane Inc.
Category
AI Wearable / Assistant
Model years
2024-2025
Market status
Discontinued
Companion app
Humane .Center

The evidence 2

Independent research, regulatory action, lawsuits and journalism about how this device handles personal data — the "what actually happens" axis. Each links to its source.

  1. Journalism · Axios · 2025-02-18

    HP acquired Humane's assets and the AI Pin was shut down, with devices bricked and all user data on Humane's servers deleted after Feb 28, 2025.

    Why it matters here: Concrete demonstration of total vendor control and abandonment risk for a cloud-dependent body-worn camera/mic device.

  2. Journalism · TechCrunch · 2023-11

    TechCrunch details the always-worn camera/mic design and the 'Trust Light,' surfacing the core question of capturing bystanders who never consented.

    Why it matters here: Establishes independent coverage of the always-on wearable-capture privacy model that defines the device.

Are you the maker? Respond to this finding

Free. There is no paid or faster path, and nothing about a rating is for sale. Prove you control your company's domain with one DNS record; a person then reads your statement beside our finding and decides whether to publish it.

An email is encrypted at rest and opened only to answer you; it is erased 30 days after we resolve this (or 180 days if still open), and you can erase it sooner. Unproven filings are deleted after 14 days.

Think something here is wrong?

Evidence and research improve when people push back. Tell us what to re-check — a misattributed domain, an outdated classification, a claim about your own app — and a human will review it. Responses can take up to 30 days.

If you leave an email it is encrypted at rest and opened only to answer you — never shared, never used for anything else. It is erased 30 days after we resolve this (or 180 days if it is still open) without you asking, and you can erase it sooner at any time; either way your correction stays, anonymously. Leave it blank and your request is fully anonymous from the start (we store no IP address either way).

Descriptive, cited, not legal advice; ratings are versioned and corrections create a new version. Data from the IoT Info Grabber DB research project, CC BY-SA 4.0.

← Back to the IoT Privacy Database