← IoT Privacy Database

Lovense Connected Toy

Lovense (Shenzhen Lianwan Technology) · Intimate Device

Staff Reviewed — a person at DeSpy reviewed this rating.

7.7Surveillance
Index
Policy — what its policy permitsD
Evidence — what research provesF

Its account system let anyone convert a public username into a user's email in under a second and take over accounts with just an email, exposing roughly 11.37 million users in 2025.

Why this rating

Lovense's account system let anyone convert a public username into a user's email in under a second, exposing roughly 11.37 million accounts to takeover in 2025 — a critical security failure affecting a highly sensitive device category.

What it is

Manufacturer
Lovense (Shenzhen Lianwan Technology)
Category
Intimate Device
Model years
2011-present
Market status
Current
Companion app
Lovense Remote

The evidence 4

Independent research, regulatory action, lawsuits and journalism about how this device handles personal data — the "what actually happens" axis. Each links to its source.

  1. Major breach · bobdahacker.com · 2025-08-01

    Independent researcher follow-up showing the Lovense email-leak vulnerability remained exploitable after the initial disclosure.

    Why it matters here: Follow-up confirming the vulnerability remained exploitable.

  2. Major breach · TechCrunch · 2025-07-29

    TechCrunch reports a vulnerability let anyone convert a Lovense user's public username into their private email address in under a second, enabling account takeover.

    Why it matters here: TechCrunch's direct report on the Lovense email-exposure and account-takeover vulnerability.

  3. Journalism · The Verge · 2025-07-29

    The Verge's coverage of the Lovense app vulnerability exposing user email addresses and enabling account hijacking.

    Why it matters here: The Verge's coverage of the Lovense vulnerability.

  4. Journalism · Vice · 2025-07-29

    Vice's reporting on the scale of the Lovense email-exposure vulnerability and the company's slow initial response.

    Why it matters here: Vice's reporting on the scale of the exposure and slow company response.

Are you the maker? Respond to this finding

Free. There is no paid or faster path, and nothing about a rating is for sale. Prove you control your company's domain with one DNS record; a person then reads your statement beside our finding and decides whether to publish it.

An email is encrypted at rest and opened only to answer you; it is erased 30 days after we resolve this (or 180 days if still open), and you can erase it sooner. Unproven filings are deleted after 14 days.

Think something here is wrong?

Evidence and research improve when people push back. Tell us what to re-check — a misattributed domain, an outdated classification, a claim about your own app — and a human will review it. Responses can take up to 30 days.

If you leave an email it is encrypted at rest and opened only to answer you — never shared, never used for anything else. It is erased 30 days after we resolve this (or 180 days if it is still open) without you asking, and you can erase it sooner at any time; either way your correction stays, anonymously. Leave it blank and your request is fully anonymous from the start (we store no IP address either way).

Descriptive, cited, not legal advice; ratings are versioned and corrections create a new version. Data from the IoT Info Grabber DB research project, CC BY-SA 4.0.

← Back to the IoT Privacy Database