← IoT Privacy Database

Strava

Strava, Inc. · Wearable / Fitness Tracker

Staff Reviewed — a person at DeSpy reviewed this rating.

4.5Surveillance
Index
Policy — what its policy permitsD
Evidence — what research provesD

Strava records precise GPS tracks of your runs and rides, building a detailed map of where you live, work out and travel, plus timestamps, pace and heart-rate data. Its social features expose more than most users realize: the global Heatmap aggregates everyone's routes, the Flyby feature shows other athletes who were near you (with names, photos and routes), and segment leaderboards publicize your regular paths. Default-public sharing has repeatedly turned individual movement data into a public dataset.

Why this rating

Deductions: precise, continuous location is the core data and is highly sensitive (-15); several exposure features (Heatmap, Flyby) historically defaulted to public/opt-out rather than opt-in (-10); privacy-setting complexity and vague aggregate-data language (-7); unilateral terms changes (-5). Granular privacy controls now exist, but the burden remains on the user to lock them down.

What it is

Manufacturer
Strava, Inc.
Category
Wearable / Fitness Tracker
Model years
2009-present
Market status
Current
Companion app
Strava

The evidence 3

Independent research, regulatory action, lawsuits and journalism about how this device handles personal data — the "what actually happens" axis. Each links to its source.

  1. Ngo review · Privacy International · 2018-01

    Strava's 2017 global Heatmap, aggregating a billion activities, inadvertently revealed the perimeters, internal layouts and patrol routes of secret military bases in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and Somalia.

    Why it matters here: Demonstrates how this service's default aggregation of GPS tracks can expose sensitive locations of its users at scale.

  2. Journalism · BleepingComputer · 2024

    The Flyby feature reveals the identity, photo and route (effectively the home area) of nearby athletes, a design repeatedly flagged as a stalking vector.

    Why it matters here: Directly documents a stalking/deanonymization risk built into this service's social features.

  3. Journalism · AlternativeTo · 2023-06

    2023 research showed the updated Heatmap could still be used to identify individual users' home addresses from their activity starting points.

    Why it matters here: Shows the location-exposure problem persists years after the 2018 military-base incident.

Are you the maker? Respond to this finding

Free. There is no paid or faster path, and nothing about a rating is for sale. Prove you control your company's domain with one DNS record; a person then reads your statement beside our finding and decides whether to publish it.

An email is encrypted at rest and opened only to answer you; it is erased 30 days after we resolve this (or 180 days if still open), and you can erase it sooner. Unproven filings are deleted after 14 days.

Think something here is wrong?

Evidence and research improve when people push back. Tell us what to re-check — a misattributed domain, an outdated classification, a claim about your own app — and a human will review it. Responses can take up to 30 days.

If you leave an email it is encrypted at rest and opened only to answer you — never shared, never used for anything else. It is erased 30 days after we resolve this (or 180 days if it is still open) without you asking, and you can erase it sooner at any time; either way your correction stays, anonymously. Leave it blank and your request is fully anonymous from the start (we store no IP address either way).

Descriptive, cited, not legal advice; ratings are versioned and corrections create a new version. Data from the IoT Info Grabber DB research project, CC BY-SA 4.0.

← Back to the IoT Privacy Database