← IoT Privacy Database

Utility Smart Meter (generic AMI)

Generic (no single maker) · Smart Meter

Staff Reviewed · 2026-09-28 — a person at DeSpy reviewed this rating.

4.0Surveillance
Index
Policy — what its policy permitsC
Evidence — what research provesC

Records energy usage at 15-minute intervals stored up to three years, which the Seventh Circuit held reveals occupancy, sleep and eating routines and appliance use — a Fourth Amendment 'search,' though a reasonable one.

Why this rating

Generic utility smart meters retain 15-minute interval energy data for up to three years, which the Seventh Circuit found reveals occupancy, sleep and appliance-use routines and constitutes a Fourth Amendment 'search,' though the court found it a reasonable one given the municipal billing purpose.

What it is

Manufacturer
Generic (no single maker)
Category
Smart Meter
Model years
2010-present
Market status
Current

The evidence 3

Independent research, regulatory action, lawsuits and journalism about how this device handles personal data — the "what actually happens" axis. Each links to its source.

  1. Lawsuit · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018-08-16

    The Seventh Circuit held that collecting smart-meter data every 15 minutes constitutes a Fourth Amendment 'search' but ruled it reasonable given the municipal interest, since interval data reveals occupancy, sleep and appliance-use patterns.

    Why it matters here: The Seventh Circuit Naperville case is the foundational legal precedent on smart-meter interval-data privacy.

  2. Academic paper · Yale Journal on Regulation · 2018-09-01

    Legal academic analysis of the Naperville smart-meter Fourth Amendment ruling and its implications for IoT data collection generally.

    Why it matters here: Academic legal analysis of the Naperville decision's broader implications.

  3. Journalism · Smart Grid Awareness · 2018-08-18

    Advocacy commentary criticizing the Seventh Circuit's Naperville ruling that upheld smart-meter data collection despite recognizing it as a Fourth Amendment search.

    Why it matters here: Advocacy commentary critical of the Naperville ruling's implications for smart-meter privacy.

Where your data goes

Third parties this device's data has flowed to, and on what basis. An ended tag means the flow has verifiably stopped — it stays listed for the record.

Are you the maker? Respond to this finding

Free. There is no paid or faster path, and nothing about a rating is for sale. Prove you control your company's domain with one DNS record; a person then reads your statement beside our finding and decides whether to publish it.

An email is encrypted at rest and opened only to answer you; it is erased 30 days after we resolve this (or 180 days if still open), and you can erase it sooner. Unproven filings are deleted after 14 days.

Think something here is wrong?

Evidence and research improve when people push back. Tell us what to re-check — a misattributed domain, an outdated classification, a claim about your own app — and a human will review it. Responses can take up to 30 days.

If you leave an email it is encrypted at rest and opened only to answer you — never shared, never used for anything else. It is erased 30 days after we resolve this (or 180 days if it is still open) without you asking, and you can erase it sooner at any time; either way your correction stays, anonymously. Leave it blank and your request is fully anonymous from the start (we store no IP address either way).

Descriptive, cited, not legal advice; ratings are versioned and corrections create a new version. Data from the IoT Info Grabber DB research project, CC BY-SA 4.0.

← Back to the IoT Privacy Database